A recent case overseen by attorneys at Barcus Arenas, PLLC, has resulted in a judge closing a longstanding “appraisal loophole” exploited by insurance companies.
This loophole in Texas insurance law has allowed insurance companies to invoke a right of appraisal at the last minute to avoid litigation and jury trial in bad-faith insurance lawsuits.
The decision, made by the chief justice of the Southern District, clarifies under what conditions insurance companies tacitly waive their right to appraisal in insurance contracts.
This case has enormous implications for plaintiffs in insurance lawsuits, as it has significantly lowered the burden of proving that an insurance company has waived its right to request appraisals to settle insurance disputes.
If you have further questions about our case and what this means for insurance law, feel free to contact a Houston appraisal disputes lawyer at our firm today. Consultations are free, so there is no risk to getting in touch.
What Is the Appraisal Loophole in Texas?
Texas SB 458 requires all residential and auto insurance policies in Texas to include an appraisal clause stating that each party may request an appraisal to resolve disputes over the value of repairs and damages. The appraisal is legally binding and is meant to hasten claim resolution when conflicts arise.
The problem is that the right to appraisal has become a kind of “get out of jail free” card for insurance companies that are facing litigation. Insurers will delay and dispute claims until they are facing imminent legal action, then invoke their right to appraisal.
By doing this, they only have to pay the binding appraised amount, which is often much less than statutory penalties for contract violations and bad faith insurance practices.
This loophole allows insurance companies to stall and delay claims until the very last minute, then invoke their right to appraisal to avoid being on the losing end of a jury decision in a lawsuit.
For a free legal consultation, call (800) 941-1041
The Case: Anderson vs Allstate (2025)
The case under consideration involves plaintiff Mary Anderson, who was suing Allstate Insurance Company for breach of contract. After a year-long timeline of disputes regarding hurricane damage to her property, plaintiff Anderson filed a lawsuit in March 2025 alleging breach of contract and bad faith insurance practices. In July 2025, Allstate filed a motion to compel appraisal and abate the case pending final evaluation.
In her decision rejecting Allstate’s motion, District Judge Lee Rosenthal agreed with our argument that Allstate’s pattern of continuing and intentional conduct throughout the dispute process constituted a waiver of its right to appraisal.
Allstate performed repeated inspections and estimates, and eventually lowballed our client with a settlement amount substantially lower than the estimates.
Even after the plaintiff filed a lawsuit, Allstate didn’t invoke appraisal after discovery, an initial conference, and failed mediation. The court found that Allstate had “unreasonably delayed” asserting its right to appraisal until well after the plaintiff had assumed several non-recoverable legal costs and other expenses.
Given that a right to appraisal exists to expedite dispute resolution, Allstate’s actions undermine the very justification for the appraisal clause in the first place. The judge ruled that Allstate displayed prejudice in delaying seeking appraisal and so rejected its motion to compel appraisal.
What This Decision Means for Insurance Lawsuits
The decision matters because it has effectively lowered the burden of proving that insurance companies have waived their right to request an appraisal.
The current legal standard holds that appraisal rights are waived when the two parties reach an impasse and one party delays seeking appraisal for prejudicial reasons.
Our case is important because it sets standards for judging insurer conduct as prejudicial. Specifically, prejudice can be inferred through conduct attempting to give insurers an unfair tactical advantage. Allstate could have invoked appraisal at any time during the dispute, but it only did so after repeated inspections and after our client incurred expenses that the appraisal settlement wouldn’t cover.
Texas law doesn’t explicitly state how long an unreasonable delay in seeking appraisal is. But our case demonstrates that the insurance company’s conduct impacts judgments of prejudice and satisfies the high standard of appraisal waiver.
Closing this appraisal loophole will make it significantly easier for plaintiffs in insurance lawsuits to meet the standard of proof and will prevent insurance companies from relying on appraisal clauses to avoid a negative jury decision.
Click to contact our insurance claims lawyers today
Contact Barcus Arenas, PLLC, Today
Insurance companies are very sophisticated with the tactics they use to avoid their payment obligations. But we are dedicated to combating insurance giants and changing the legal landscape to remove their advantages.
If you are currently in an insurance dispute, you need an attorney with a thorough understanding of insurance law and a proven track record going up against insurance giants.
Contact the team at Barcus Arenas, PLLC, to schedule a free consultation with a Houston insurance claims lawyer.
Call or text (800) 941-1041 or complete a Free Case Evaluation form
